The Right to Bargain for Job Security in Collective Agreements
This article argues that as a result of the lack of clarity on the dual questions of ‘permitted matters’ and ‘interests of employer and employees’, Fair Work Commission has been given very wide discretion in Workplace Determination cases to decide to retain or reject job security clauses.
In a landmark Workplace Determination made after the enactment of Fair Work Act, the Qantas determination, FWC chose to reject job security clauses on merit grounds, despite paying lip service to the interests of employees’ job security.
This article argues that the Qantas decision was a political decision by the FWC, given free rein by the lack of clarity in the legislation.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).