The Future of International Arbitration in Australia
Abstract
The International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) is a Commonwealth Act that implements Australia’s obligations to enforce and recognise foreign arbitration agreements and arbitral awards under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1959. The avowed purpose of the reforms was to position Australia as an attractive seat for arbitration in the Asia-Pacific region. Given the elapse of time since the amendments, it is opportune to reflect on how far Australia has come in that time, and the challenges and opportunities going forward. Undoubtedly, there has been a shift in the attitude of Australian courts towards greater judicial support and less judicial intervention in the arbitration process. Based on an extensive discussion of a particular dispute, TCL v Castel, the paper highlights that the High Court’s judgment confirms Australia is an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction. Had the decision gone the other way, it may have sounded the death knell for international arbitration in Australia.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).