Utilisation of National Interest Criteria in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
A Threat to the Rule of Law
Abstract
In Australia, the Commonwealth executive enjoys significant power to make decisions applying a national interest criterion in Commonwealth statutes. Ultimately, this paper argues that the utilisation of such a criterion by the Commonwealth executive in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) undermines the rule of law doctrine in Australia.
A fundamental tenet of the rule of law is the idea that the law is clear, identifiable and consistent in its approach. Given the imprecise and vague nature of a national interest criterion, it is argued that the notion is often far from clear and identifiable. The net result has meant that aggrieved litigants have had significant difficulties in both understanding and enforcing their rights, given the ambiguity associated with a national interest criterion in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
Further, an examination of various Australian cases demonstrated a lack of consistency in the interpretation of a national interest criterion in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). This lack of consistency led to a deficiency of clarity in the operation of particular Australian laws, especially in the context of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
References
Cases
A v Hayden (1984) 156 CLR 532
Anderson v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts [2010] FCA 57
Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 54
Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (Communist Party Case) (1951) 83 CLR 1
Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2007) 228 CLR 651
Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd (No 4) (2001) FCR 62
City of Subiaco v Heytesbury Properties Pty Ltd (2001) 24 WAR 146
Conwest Global Communications Corporation v Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia (1997) 147 ALR 509
Cooper v Wandsworth Board of Works (1863) 14 CBNS 180
Davis v Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79
Durani v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 314 ALR 130
Habib v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2009] FCA 228
Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438
Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2005] FCA 664
Jione v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 144
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550
Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455
Leisure Entertainment Pty Ltd v Willis (1996) 64 FCR 205
Madafferi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 118 FCR 326
Maurangi v Honourable Chris Bowen MP, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 15
Miller v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 590
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 211 ALR 126
Minister for Immigration v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1
Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 238 CLR 1
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476
Plaintiff S297-2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 89 ALJR 292
Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495
R v Goreng-Goreng [2008] ACTSC 74
R & R Fazzolari Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council [2009] HCA 12
Re Ditfort; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 FCR 47
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391
Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82
Re Queensland Electricity Commission; Ex parte Electrical Trades Union of Australia (1987) 72 ALR 1
Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673
Victoria v Commonwealth (Australian Assistance Plan Case) (1975) 134 CLR 338
XCIV v The Australian Crime Commission [2015] FCA 586
Legislation & Regulations
Appropriation Act (No 1) 2012-2013 (Cth)
Appropriation Act (No. 3) 2012-2013 (Cth)
Appropriation Acts (No 1) 2013-2014 (Cth)
Automotive Transformation Scheme Regulations 2010 (Cth)
Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth)
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
Financial Framework (Supplementary Powers) Regulations 1997 (Cth)
Insurance Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1991 (Cth)
International Monetary Agreements Act 1947 (Cth)
International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 (Cth)
Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Sweden) Regulations 2001 (Cth)
National Environment Protection Measures (Implementation) Act 1998 (Cth)
Radiocommunications Act 1992 (Cth)
Secondary Sources
A V Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed, Oxford, 1960
Andrew Greenwood, “ADR processes and their role in consensus building” (2010) 21 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 11
Cheryl Saunders and Kevin KF Yam, “Government regulation by contract: implications for the rule of law” (2004) 15 Public Law Review 51
De Q Walker, The Tax Wilderness: How to Restore the Rule of Law, Perspectives on Tax Reform, The Centre for Independent Studies, 2004
G Loughton, Privative Clauses and the Commonwealth Constitution, Paper Presented at the Australian Government Solicitor’s Constitutional Law Forum, Canberra, 23 October 2002
Giridhar Kowtal, “Jurisdictional error and no-invalidity clauses at State level: Does the High Court still hold all the cards?” (2015) 22 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 253
Helen Pringle and Elaine Thompson, “Tampa as metaphor: majoritarianism and the separation of powers” (2003) 10 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 107
Joanne Kinslor and James English, “Decision-Making in the National Interest?” (2015) 79 Australian Institute of Administrative Law Forum 35
Joseph Raz, “The Rule of Law and its Virtue” in Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Clarendon Press, 1979
Judith Shklar, “Political Theory and the Rule of Law” in Hoffman (ed), Political Thought and Political Thinkers, 1998, University of Chicago Press
Leslie Zines, The High Court and the Constitution, The Federation Press, 5th ed, 2008
Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law: Revised Edition, Yale University Press, 1969
Murray Gleeson, The Rule of Law, Boyer Lectures, 2000
Murray Gleeson, "Courts and the Rule of Law", The Rule of Law Lecture Series, Melbourne University, 7 November 2001: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/former-justices/gleesoncj/cj_ruleoflaw.htm
Peter Billings, “Operation Sovereign Borders and interdiction at sea: CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection” (2016) 23 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 76
Robert Summers, “A Federal Theory of Rule of Law” (1993) 6(2) Ratio Juris 127
Scott Guy and Barbara Hocking, “Migration Act and the constitutionality of privative clauses” (2008) 16 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 21
Senator Bartlett, Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, Senate, Second Reading Speech, 29 August 2001, 27827
Simon Evans, “The Rule of Law, Constitutionalism and the MV Tampa” (2002) 13 Public Law Review 94
The Hon John Doyle AC, “Investing in the Judiciary” (2004) 14 Journal of Judicial Administration 5
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
